Results: Binary Logistic Regression

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Model Information

Model Information
Data Set MYLIB.VIDEOGAMEDATAPRIMARYV2  
Response Variable score_phrase score_phrase
Number of Response Levels 2  
Model binary logit  
Optimization Technique Fisher's scoring  

Observations Summary

Number of Observations Read 4571
Number of Observations Used 4571

Response Profile

Response Profile
Ordered
Value
score_phrase Total
Frequency
1 Bad 1422
2 Good 3149

Probability modeled is score_phrase='Good'.

Convergence Status

Model Convergence Status
Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied.

Fit Statistics

Model Fit Statistics
Criterion Intercept Only Intercept and Covariates
AIC 5669.778 2413.708
SC 5676.206 2458.701
-2 Log L 5667.778 2399.708

Global Tests

Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0
Test Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq
Likelihood Ratio 3268.0696 6 <.0001
Score 2473.8905 6 <.0001
Wald 1007.4369 6 <.0001

Parameter Estimates

Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates
Parameter DF Estimate Standard
Error
Wald
Chi-Square
Pr > ChiSq
Intercept 1 -16.4065 0.5620 852.2141 <.0001
NA_Sales 1 1.3564 0.5794 5.4805 0.0192
EU_Sales 1 0.3963 0.5966 0.4412 0.5066
JP_Sales 1 0.9931 0.6456 2.3661 0.1240
Global_Sales 1 -0.6550 0.4849 1.8246 0.1768
Critic_Score 1 0.2404 0.00809 883.3136 <.0001
User_Score 1 0.0883 0.0442 3.9839 0.0459

Odds Ratios

Odds Ratio Estimates
Effect Point Estimate 95% Wald
Confidence Limits
NA_Sales 3.882 1.247 12.085
EU_Sales 1.486 0.462 4.786
JP_Sales 2.700 0.762 9.569
Global_Sales 0.519 0.201 1.344
Critic_Score 1.272 1.252 1.292
User_Score 1.092 1.002 1.191

Association Statistics

Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses
Percent Concordant 94.9 Somers' D 0.898
Percent Discordant 5.1 Gamma 0.898
Percent Tied 0.0 Tau-a 0.385
Pairs 4477878 c 0.949

ROC Curve

 Slope = 1 
 Y = 0
ROC Curve for Model

Influence Plots

Panel 1

 Y = 0  Y = 0
Influence Plots: Panel 1

Panel 2

Influence Plots: Panel 2